Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 or the Google Pixel Watch?

Galaxy Watch6 or Google Pixel- Which is better

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6Google Pixel Watch
The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 has a bigger screen encased in more robust glass, a quicker CPU, and a vast array of Samsung Health tracking functions, while updating a recognizable appearance.The Pixel Watch is a terrific first home-made alternative from Google, thanks to its combination of stunning design, easy software, and full fitness monitoring.

With its Galaxy Watch 4 running Wear OS 3, Samsung was the first manufacturer to release a wristwatch running the next development of Wear OS. Now that we’ve reached the Galaxy Watch 6 and Wear OS 4, Samsung is no longer the only player in this market.

Google released its first DIY smartwatch in 2022, running a completely different version of the software, with a completely new design concept, and relying heavily on Fitbit’s experience in fitness tracking. So, which one is the best? The Pixel Watch with Fitbit or Samsung’s new Galaxy Watch? – Galaxy Watch6 or Google Pixel- Which is better..

Galaxy Watch6 or Google Pixel- Which is better – Price, specifications, and availability:

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 will be available in the market in mid-August 2023, with a competitive beginning price. At the time of writing, the 40mm model with Wi-Fi was only $276, marking a slight decrease from the initial $299 price point.

The Pixel Watch, which has been around since late 2022 and is set to be upgraded soon, may be found for a similar price to the Galaxy Watch. It was available for roughly $330 at the time of writing, but has since dropped lower during sales events.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
Google Pixel Watch

Battery LifeUp to 40 hours (AOD off) – Up to 30 hours (AOD on)Up to 24 hours use
Operating SystemWear OS 4 with One UI 5Wear OS 3.5
Lens MaterialSapphire CrystalCustom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Case MaterialArmour AluminiumStainless Steel
Sizes40mm and 44mm41mm
ColorsGraphite, silver and goldChampagne Gold, Matte Black and Polished Silver
Display480 x 480 (44mm) or 432 x 432 (40mm) Super AMOLED450 x 450 AMOLED
CPUExynos W930 dual-core 1.4GHzExynos 9110 processor with Cortex M33 co-processor
RAM2GB2GB
Storage16GB32GB
Battery425mAh (44mm) or 300mAh (40mm)
294mAh
ConnectivityLTE available, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 2.4GHz and 5GHz, NFC
4G LTE available, Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 2.4GHz
Health sensorsHeart Rate, ECG, Temperature Sensors, Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Light SensorOptical heart-rate, Altimeter, Accelerometer, Blood oxygen sensor, Gyroscope, Multipurpose electrical sensor, ambient light sensor, compass
Dimensions42.8 x 44.4 x 9.0mm (44mm) or 38.8 x 40.4 x 9.0mm (40mm)
41 x 41 x 12.3 mm

Design

So, let’s start with the obvious – design and durability – an essential factor with anything that’s as much about accessorizing and style as it is about technology and utility. And it’s safe to assume that the two companies chose completely different tactics in this regard.

Samsung’s watch has that flat and clean design that is – admittedly – pretty simple. Of course, unless you purchase the Classic variant. A plain flat disc is the conventional model.

Google has put a lot more work into the appearance of the Pixel Watch. It has the wonderful domed glass top that curves and perfectly integrates into the metal shell, and it just has one single, central button that also functions as a spinning crown, with subtle ridges or grooves running all the way.

It’s unquestionably more appealing than Samsung’s standard model. Even the simple strap is better, as is the design of how it fits into the watch case. The Pixel Watch’s soft, matt-finished rubber strap has these elegant curves and rounded bits that add to the overall softness of the shape, and it fits seamlessly to the side of the watch using a really clever mechanism that attaches securely and is fairly simple to fit and remove once you get the hang of it.

Display

In certain ways, the display is also a component of the design. Particularly when the display-to-bezel ratio is considered. The smallest model from Samsung has a 1.3-inch display that is much closer to the watch’s edges. In fact, despite having a larger display, the smallest Galaxy Watch 6 is still smaller than the Pixel Watch.

software knowledge

When Wear OS 3 originally debuted, much was made of the latest incarnations of the operating system, owing to the fact that it was marketed as a collaboration between Samsung and Google. The Galaxy Watch was the first device to use it.

After a few years, Google has its own version on this software. And, as in the smartphone business, there is a distinct variation in approach. We believe that in this area, Samsung has the most to gain from Google’s ideas.

Physical fitness and health

Let’s talk about fitness and health for a minute because for many people, this is what determines whether or not they find a smartwatch useful. We wish it could be as simple as ‘Google has Fitbit onboard, so it’s better,’ but it’s not that straightforward.

Conclusion

Finally, in an ideal world, a Wear OS watch would be the confluence of these two. Google’s seductive glass curves and aesthetics, the Pixel Watch strap mechanism, and Google’s bloat-free software and Fitbit, but in a watch that’s as sturdy as Samsung’s, accessible in numerous sizes and styles like Samsung’s, and – critically – battery life that’s as excellent, if not better than Samsung’s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *